Fukushima, the Worlds worst Industrial or nuclear accident, or Goodbye Japanese

Radio-activity destroys fertility.

Australia’s first uranium mine was at a place called Rum Jungle (rum as in strange not drink), since the aboriginal folks had noted that this was a place to avoid, since any group that lived there didn’t survive long.

It is possible to argue that that the low fertility rates in the Ukraine and Belarus are due to the economy. It is very hard to find in English, fertlilty rates for specific districts in these countrys.

It is possible however to compare the fertility rate for Cumbria, the home of Britains worst nuclear accident (the Windscale fire) and compare it to London. Nearly two generations later Cumbria has a fertility rate 20% lower than that of London.

Fukushima is the Worlds worst nuclear accident and it is converting the fertilty rate of the northen part of the island of Honshu to something resembling that of an old age home.

The First World War was not fought for freedom

The Radical Antipodes or the WW1

was not fought for freedom

Here is a pub trivia question.

Which countries that were involved in the First World War had what we consider to be universal suffrage?

Universal suffrage being defined as all people over the age of majority (21 years in 1914) having the right to vote.

The answer may surprise you. It was only Australia (qualified) and New Zealand. To our Australian shame I should point out that Aborigines were considered simple and thus were wards of the State and we had failed to grant woman the right to vote at Federation.

Allies WW1 Women suffrage in 1914 Year granted Notes
Australia Yes

1902

  
Belgium No

1919

  
Canada No

1918

Quebec women had wait until 1940 before they could vote in provincial elections
France No

1944

Only exercised at national level in 1945
Egypt No

1956

 
Great Britain No

1918

in 1918 for 30 years and over, full extension in 1930
India No

1947

Dominion of the British Empire in 1914
Italy No

1946

  
Japan No

1945

Some county level voting before 1945
New Zealand Yes

1893

  
Pakistan No

1947

Dominion of the British Empire in 1914
Portugal No

1931

  
Russia No

1918

  
Saudi Arabia No Not yet Considered part of the Ottoman empire in 1914
South Africa No

1930

1930 for white women and 1996 for all citizens
USA No

1920

  

 

Central powers WW1 Women suffrage in 1914 Year granted Notes
Austria No

1918

Part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1914
Germany No

1918

  
Hungary No

1918

Part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1914
Iraq No

1980

Part of the Ottoman empire in 1914
Syria No

1949

Part of the Ottoman empire in 1914
Turkey No

1930

Part of the Ottoman empire in 1914

 

Some of the values are based on Wikipedia and quick google search give qualified answers for the vote actually given. Examples are French women being given the vote in 1944 but only able use it in 1945 and if you were a muslim woman living in Algeria (then considered part of France) you could only vote in 1958 or in Australia real true franchise being granted after the 1967 referendum which recognized Aborigines.

It should be pointed out that full legal rights for women followed or is following years after the right to vote was granted. As a male it is embarrassing to think that in 1914 in many respects even in Australia a woman’s rights were marginally more than a child’s.

The paradox of the First World War was that it was not fought for freedom but that many of the freedoms that we take for granted came out of the changes that that terrible event created.

Margaret Bourke-White – Japan June 1952, Orphans of Occupation

 

Thanks to Google source:Life

 

 

By-blows of Occupation of Japan

By-blows of Occupation of Japan

 Large picture

Japan Essay
Date taken: June 1952
Photographer: Margaret Bourke-White
Size: 1280 x 983 pixels (17.8 x 13.7 inches)

(no tags – probably never used.)

The editors of Life magazine must have had a fit when they saw this photo (one of three in the Japan essay and likely not used). At first glance it looks like a group of Japanese children with a minder. On closer inspection you notice that these children are of mixed descent and there are two nuns in the background. This suggests that this was taken at an orphanage or school and these are the orphans of occupation. (Look how we are fighting the cold war, people, or proof positive somebody has been making love, not war.)

Margaret Bourke-White was no fool and this was probably her way of reminding people back home that the USA needed a policy to deal with these children. More than half a century later, it is very difficult to convey the feelings that this picture would invoked because there had been for decades, the theme of the yellow peril and since 1940 propaganda against first the Japanese, then the Communist Chinese.

NOT ONE OF THESE CHILDREN CHOSE THEIR FATE.

Note to Americans, Australia did a very poor job with their orphans of occupation, we just left them behind.